CBP officials said that just because ACE isn't able to flag when a purchaser is receiving packages from different exporters that add up to more than $800 in one day doesn't mean the $800 limit is an honor system.
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related matters:
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related matters:
CBP “plans to continue discussions” with the trade about an agency proposal to create an ACE portal for small importers, a CBP spokesperson said this week. Mentioned in a report released ahead of the Dec. 11 meeting of the Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee, the proposal is “one of several ACE 2.0 operational scenarios developed by CBP” that are “being reviewed with COAC to inform early planning decisions for ACE 2.0,” the spokesperson said. The COAC report didn’t provide any further detail on the small importer portal beyond the fact that it was discussed in a “single issue call” with the relevant working group. The CBP spokesperson declined to provide additional details.
CBP has moved up the target date for when the agency expects to deploy an enhancement that could affect facilities handling low-value Section 321 shipments.
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related matters:
In its third ACE 2.0 test, run last month, CBP showed how an outside organization -- the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) -- can provide information to the EPA and CBP ahead of arrival, so that the government knows chemicals are legitimate.
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Food that was denied entry but can be reconditioned to meet FDA requirements isn't prohibited merchandise, so it isn't eligible for a refund if it's exported or destroyed, CBP said in a recent ruling.