Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico are going away, the U.S. said May 17. They will be lifted from Canadian imports within 48 hours, but the Mexican government has not indicated timing for the relief there, and the Commerce Department did not respond to an inquiry by press time. Canada and Mexico will lift their retaliatory tariffs, which hit U.S. prepared food, agriculture and metals, at the same time the U.S. tariffs end.
House members that are leaders on trade, in the center and on the left, say that U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is recognizing the ways he's going to need to change the new NAFTA to get Democratic votes, but it's not yet clear how far he'll be willing or able to go. Wisconsin's Rep. Ron Kind, a New Democrat and free trader, said in a hallway interview with International Trade Today May 10, "We're kind of at an impasse. They keep telling us there's no way they can open this up and tweak it, and make this minor adjustment and we're saying ... we haven't met a trade agreement yet where members of Congress weren't allowed to get our fingerprints on it a little bit, massage it here and there for it to get to 218 [votes]. So, until somewhat blinks on that front ... ."
CBP's proposal for how to classify garments with 50/50 fiber blends would add a "significant amount of additional burden on importers of apparel and made-up textile articles," HanesBrands said in comments filed May 2 with the agency. The filing was in response to CBP's proposed ruling revocation that seems to change how goods of 50/50 blends are classified (see 1905020044). Under the proposal, the tariff classification of the fibers in the 50/50 blend are first considered (e.g., cotton of chapter 52 versus man-made filaments of chapter 54), then the entire garment is classified according to whichever of those constituent fibers in the 50/50 blend is classified last in numerical order.
A vote on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement will “hopefully” be soon, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, but stressed that the deal needs strong enforcement provisions before any progress will be made. During a Washington Post Live interview on May 8, Pelosi said an enforcement agreement is a prerequisite to any vote. “Unless you have it built into the agreement … it’s not binding on the other country. It’s us talking to ourselves,” she said. In a recent conversation with U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Pelosi said, she urged him to include enforcement in the agreement, or else the agreement is “not a serious thing.” Pelosi said the Trump administration has expressed a desire to work on enforcement and said Trump has told her “we want to get to a yes” on the deal. “So hopefully that will be soon,” she said.
Even as it described the cloudy outlook for the new NAFTA's ratification, a new report from the American Council for Capital Formation's Center for Policy Research says policy makers should ratify the agreement, and not move toward a withdrawal from NAFTA.
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for April 29 - May 3 in case they were missed.
CBP's proposed ruling revocation on garments with 50/50 blends of fiber (see 1904050037) seems to indicate a big shift in the way the agency classifies garments and other finished textile goods, according to industry experts. The proposal is a "significant change in policy," Sandler Travis lawyer Elise Shibles said in a May 2 email. The proposal "could significantly impact a wide range of imported goods, including their duty rates, qualification for free trade agreements, and sourcing supply chains," she and trade consultant Tom Gould said in a post on the firm's website.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, speaking about the meeting of top Democrats at the White House April 30, said that they told the president "we're not there yet" on the new NAFTA, and added " that enforcement will be an important part of the consideration."
If House Speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn't bring the new NAFTA to a vote, NAFTA could stay in place, Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said at a conference April 30. Mulvaney dismissed the Democrats' argument that the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement could be amended in discrete ways to satisfy their complaints before going to a vote. Interviewer Maria Bartiromo pointed out that Democrats say "I'm not signing it in its current form."
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for April 22-26 in case they were missed.