Foam footwear previously barred from entry due to an exclusion order from the International Trade Commission may enter the U.S. following a reexamination by CBP, even though the issue wasn't protestable, CBP said in ruling H323683, released May 16. The ruling was sparked by a Jan. 31 protest by Triple T Trading, which argued its imports of foam footwear should not have been barred from entry.
The Court of International Trade dismissed two cases brought by steel importer Voestalpine USA and steel purchaser Bilstein Cold Rolled Steel seeking to retroactively apply a Section 232 steel and aluminum tariff exclusion that was originally issued with a clerical error. Judge Mark Barnett said that the plaintiffs did not seek any relief that the court could grant since the entries eligible for the exclusion had already been liquidated, and the court does not have the power to order their reliquidation.
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The Bureau of Industry and Security this week extended by a month a public comment period to allow more time for feedback on the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council's Secure Supply Chains Working Group. BIS said it wants to allow commenters to “take into account any developments or announcements that may occur” during the TTC’s upcoming meeting in France May 15-16. Comments, originally due May 23 (see 2204050012), are now due by June 23.
The International Trade Commission published notices in the April 1 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent or other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will be in another ITT article):
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The International Trade Commission published notices in the March 14 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent or other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will be in another ITT article):
The Bureau of Industry and Security is asking for comments on the Section 232 exclusion process, including the request, objection, rebuttal and surrebuttal process, the standards of review, transparency of the process, and General Approved Exclusions. Officials are particularly interested in hearing ideas about how to reduce the volume of submission errors and rejected filings in the exclusions portal; whether reducing the length or type of attachments could speed the processing of requests; whether there should be a public summary of confidential business information underpinning exclusion requests or objections; whether there should be public disclosure of delivery times in requests or objections; whether evidence supporting requests or objections should have to be from the last 90 days; and how to streamline the online forms. Comments should be filed at regulations.gov, docket number BIS-2021-0042, by March 28.
The International Trade Commission published notices in the Dec. 23 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent or other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will be in another ITT article):
The Bureau of Industry and Security seeks comments by Jan. 21 on its collections of information related to requests for Section 232 steel and aluminum tariff exclusions and objections to them. The agency’s comment request will be followed by submission of the information collections for re-approval by the Office of Management and Budget, and will help BIS “assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden.”