The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative’s list of proposed tariff subheadings set for an additional 10 percent tariff on $200 billion in imports from China covers wide swaths of the tariff schedule that initially avoided Section 301 tariffs imposed July 6. While the 25 percent tariff already in place affects only goods of Chapters 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 and 90 (with a few exceptions), USTR’s proposed list of additional subheadings includes products from nearly all sectors of the tariff schedule, with the notable exceptions of footwear and apparel and pharmaceuticals.
The Consumer Technology Association, the National Retail Federation and the Semiconductor Industry Association are among groups and companies requesting to appear at a July 24 Office of the U.S. Trade Representative hearing about the Section 301 tariffs on a second list of 284 lines of Chinese-sourced products proposed for the higher duties (see 1806210029). The Retail Industry Leaders Association and the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones are also among the commenters in docket USTR-2018-0018. Written comments are due July 23, and post-hearing rebuttal comments, July 31.
Nearly two weeks after the last batch of Section 232 tariff exclusion determinations were posted, the Bureau of Industry and Security posted eight more denials, all for Borusan Mannesmann Pipe in Texas, a Turkish-owned oil country tubular goods production facility.
CBP on July 6 published additional guidance on the application of Section 232 tariffs to steel and aluminum products. A CSMS message issued by the agency includes an overview of requirements for foreign-trade zone admissions for products covered by the tariffs, as well as information on the application of Chapter 98 provisions, temporary importations under bond, and NAFTA originating goods and duty deferral restrictions.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative on July 6 announced procedures for requesting product exclusions from Section 301 tariffs on products from China, on the same day that the 25 percent tariffs took effect (see 1807060012). Exclusion requests will be due by Oct. 9, and if granted will apply retroactively starting from July 6. Exclusions will be made on a “product basis,” so “a particular exclusion will apply to all imports of the product, regardless of whether the importer filed a request,” USTR said.
At 12:01 a.m. July 6, the additional 25 percent tariffs against Chinese imports across 818 8-digit tariff lines went into effect. Within a minute, China hit back, imposing a 25 percent tariff on 545 tariff lines. The Chinese government said the U.S. has started "the largest trade war in economic history." China said "the duties are typical bullying behavior, which will have a serious impact on the global industrial and value chain and will hinder the pace of global economic recovery, [and] trigger global market turmoil," according to an unofficial translation.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of June 25 - July 1:
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for June 25-29 in case they were missed.
Importers may need to up their customs bond amounts after the Section 301 25 percent tariffs take effect on goods from China, said Laura Siegel Rabinowitz, special counsel at Kelley Drye, in a June 28 blog post. "While bonds are based on imports for the previous twelve months, the time period is rolling and we expect CBP to be aggressively reviewing imports from China beginning on July 6," she said. Rabinowitz said that after "the Section 232 duties on imported steel and aluminum went into effect recently, CBP sent letters to certain importers giving them thirty days to increase their bonds to be commensurate with the new tariffs."
Russia recently began a World Trade Organization challenge of U.S. Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum products, the WTO said in a press release. Russia claims the tariffs violate the 1994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the WTO safeguard agreement. The country had already announced plans to retaliate. Under WTO rules, Russia may request a panel to decide the case if consultations don’t resolve the dispute in 60 days.