The Treasury Department published its fall 2015 regulatory agenda for CBP (here), which lists no new trade-related rulemakings. The agenda lists Treasury's CBP rulemakings that are pending at the proposed, interim final, final, and completed stages, as well as rulemakings that are long-term actions. The agenda lists the regulation title; past regulation(s), if any; the timeframe for the next regulatory action(s), if any; a brief description of the regulation; and a contact party name and telephone number. The Department of Homeland Security also issued its spring 2015 regulatory agenda for CBP (see 1511200014).
CBP headquarters processed customs ruling requests related to tariff classification and marking issues within about 265 days, the lengthiest average processing time among ruling categories, according to CBP ruling statistics for fiscal year 2015. Headquarters processing times vary "based on a number of factors including the nature of the ruling or decision, when complete information is presented, whether other rulings have to be modified or revoked, and the presence of any pending court cases," said a CBP spokeswoman who provided the statistics.
CBP is requesting comments by Jan. 4 on an existing information collection for declaration for free entry of returned American products. CBP proposes (here) to extend the expiration date of this information collection without a change to the burden hours or information collected.
Members of the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America (NCBFAA) were meeting with lawmakers on Capitol Hill Sept. 29 to request that several specific provisions make it into a final customs reauthorization bill. The meetings were part of the NCBFAA's Government Affairs Conference. The NCBFAA hopes to see House-proposed antidumping and countervailing duty enforcement language and streamlined drawback provisions in the final bill, according to a paper distributed by the NCBFAA to its members going to the Hill. Congress is still in the process of putting together a Customs Reauthorization conference to resolve differences between customs reauthorization legislation passed by each chamber (see 1507070066).
CBP’s recent delay of some mandatory use dates for the Automated Commercial Environment elicited a sigh of relief from the trade community, but much work remains to ensure a smooth transition, said customs brokers and software developers in recent interviews. The new staged approach, with deadlines in February and July 2016, gives the trade the time it needs to successfully migrate to ACE. However, familiar problems with quota-related entry types and still-unreleased software requirements by CBP and other agencies will remain hurdles to be overcome as ACE implementation continues over the coming year.
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for Aug. 3-7 in case they were missed.
CBP will no longer require an original signature or certified export invoice as proof for drawback claims, the agency said in a notice (here). The agency is making the change in consideration that ink signatures for original documentation or certified copies are sometimes tough to acquire, it said. The change becomes effective on Aug. 7.
CBP will target 200 “top filers” in its efforts to promote industry adoption of the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) ahead of the Nov. 1 deadline for entry summary and cargo release, according to a press release issued by the Trade Support Network (TSN) following a conference held June 23-25 in Washington.
The use of a promotional model for demonstration purposes does not constitute a "permissible use" under drawback regulations, CBP said in a ruling decision (here). CBP said in the May 28 ruling, HQ H258306, that the demonstrations of Anritsu network testing devices prior to sale go beyond incidental usage and therefore does not qualify as unused merchandise. Anritsu is a Japanese manufacturer of network test and measurement equipment for the telecommunications industry.
Customs reauthorization legislation now being considered in Congress includes provisions with "little regard to the practical effectiveness of these measures or their impact on trade flows," the National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America told the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees in a June 18 letter (here). "As conference discussions begin on H.R. 644, NCBFAA urges you to revisit these critical issues and address the need for balance between facilitation and enforcement so that this is a bill we can all stand behind," said the association. It's still unclear when conference negotiations to resolve differences between the House and Senate customs bills will begin (see 1506220012).