Instec Inc., a scientific instrument technology company based in Colorado, and Dr. Zhong Zou, its owner and president, agreed to pay $625,000 to settle allegations that the company and Zou violated the False Claims Act, DOJ announced. Instec and Zou failed to comply with the requirements of the Buy American Act when selling scientific instruments claimed to have been made in the U.S. to U.S. federal agencies and national laboratories, DOJ said.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the weeks of Aug. 15-21 and 22-28:
Jose Manuel Perez, a resident of Oxnard, California, pleaded guilty on Aug. 24 to illegally importing over 1,700 wild animals, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California said. The illegally smuggled animals include over 60 reptiles that were found hidden in his clothes at the U.S.-Mexico border. Perez pleaded guilty to two counts of smuggling goods into the U.S. and one count of wildlife trafficking.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Aug. 8-14:
The Court of International Trade agreed with the government that a nitrogen oxide sensor probe for diesel engines should be classified as an instrument of chemical analysis under Harmonized Tariff Schedule heading 9027, rather than an instrument of measurement under heading 9026 (Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. v. U.S., CIT #18-00026). In an Aug. 12 opinion, Judge Jane Restani ruled in favor of the government's March 8 cross-motion for summary judgment (see 2203140007).
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Aug. 1-7:
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of July 25-31:
The Court of International Trade in an Aug. 1 order granted a joint motion for stipulated judgment, granting refunds to importer Transpacific Steel for Section 232 steel and aluminum duties paid in error. The importer was originally granted three exclusions with the wrong Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading listed in them. After having its resubmitted exclusion requests denied, Transpacific took to the trade court to seek the exclusions and refunds for the Section 232 duties paid. It received just that following a settlement with the U.S. (Transpacific Steel v. United States, CIT #21-00362).
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of July 18-24:
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of July 11-17: