Two chainsaw chain and blade importers, TriLink Saw Chain and TriLink Global, agreed to pay $525,000 to settle allegations that the companies misclassified their imports, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Iowa said. The U.S. alleged that the importers purposely classified their chain saw chains and blades from September 2018 through June 2019 under the wrong Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading to avoid paying Section 301 China tariffs -- a violation of the False Claims Act.

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of March 7-13:

July 6 marks the fourth anniversary of the List 1 Section 301 tariffs' taking effect on Chinese imports, and the 1974 Trade Act requires their expiration after four years, “unless some conditions are met,” said David Olave, a Sandler Travis associate and trade policy adviser, on a recent podcast. “No unilateral 301 action that I know has made it through the four years, so we’re about to witness trade policy procedural history,” he said.

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 28 - March 6:

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 21-27:

A Feb. 24 Court of International Trade decision could result in "inching toward a saner and more legally sound approach to origin determinations" involving the substantial transformation test, customs lawyer Larry Friedman of Barnes Richardson said in a blog post Feb. 24. The language in the decision is "generally favorable for a simplified and more reasonable approach to origin," after years of focus on pre-determined end use of assembled components following the trade court's unappealed 2016 decision in Energizer.

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 7-13:

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Jan. 31-Feb. 6:

Emiliano Rodriguez, a Dominican Republic citizen living in Philadephia, was arrested and charged with trafficking counterfeit goods and delivering hazardous materials by air carrier in a scheme to place counterfeit goods in used vehicles, the U.S. Attorneys' Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said. In this scheme, the used vehicles were then resold to "unsuspecting customers." From January 2017 through October 2019, Rodriguez, an auto mechanic, imported counterfeit airbags from China, placing the parts in used vehicles and then flipping them to customers. In all, federal agents seized over 450 counterfeit airbags from Rodriguez's home and business, the U.S. Attorney's Office said. Rodriguez faces a maximum sentence of 20 years and fines of over $2 million if convicted. “The hazards posed to unsuspecting motorists and the general public by the alleged actions of the defendant in this case are enormous, and could have ramifications for years to come,” U.S. Attorney Jennifer Williams said. “Safety equipment as important as vehicle airbags are subject to strict quality control standards to keep everyone safe, therefore when corners are cut by utilizing counterfeit goods, the consequences can be disastrous."

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Jan. 24-30: