A listing of recent antidumping and countervailing duty messages from the Commerce Department posted to CBP's website Nov. 13, along with the case number(s) and CBP message number, is provided below. The messages are available by searching for the listed CBP message number at http://adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb.
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related issues:
CBP is requesting comments by Jan. 16 on an existing information collection for the harbor maintenance fee. CBP proposes (here) to extend the expiration date of this information collection with no change to the burden hours.
CBP is requesting comments by Jan. 16 for an existing information collection for free trade agreements. CBP proposes (here) to extend the expiration date of this information collection with a change to the burden hours.
CBP posted the transcript (here) and presentation (here) from a Nov. 13 webinar on Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) eBond.
In the Nov. 12 issue of the CBP Customs Bulletin (Vol. 48, No. 45), CBP published notices that propose to modify or revoke rulings and similar treatment for the tariff classification of brass and steel shower escutcheons (here).
A listing of recent antidumping and countervailing duty messages from the Commerce Department posted to CBP's website Nov. 12, along with the case number(s) and CBP message number, is provided below. The messages are available by searching for the listed CBP message number at http://adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb.
(Federal Register 11/14/14)
CBP issued its Nov. 12 Customs Bulletin (Vol. 48, No. 45), which contains the following ruling actions (here):
A possible change to CBP administrative ruling regulations could allow the agency to consider the arguments from multiple sides before issuing an administrative ruling on CBP enforcement of International Trade Commission exclusion orders, said CBP's Office of International Trade. CBP said it is considering a proposal to update the regulations to allow for an inter partes procedure, rather than the current ex parte procedures (see 1411120005). "It is contemplated that the inter partes process would be required as a condition for issuance of a ruling either to the importer/respondent or to the ITC complainant prior to importation of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order," said the Office of International Trade in an email. "This process once established in the regulations would afford CBP the opportunity to hear from both parties and allow each to make arguments while rebutting those of the other before issuance of binding administrative rulings." Commenters on a inter-agency review of patent exclusion orders (see 13061916) asked that CBP "create an inter partes process with a view to enhancing the efficiency, transparency and efficacy of exclusion order enforcement," said CBP.