Lacey Act Revision Bill Approved by Committee, but Certification Standards, FTC Review Cut
The House Natural Resources Committee gave its approval June 7 to HR-3210, the Retailers and Entertainers Lacey Implementation and Enforcement Fairness (RELIEF) Act. If enacted, the bill would amend the Lacey Act to exempt its application to pre-2008 plant imports and products. An amendment introduced by Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) removed provisions that would require a new certification process, adequate funding for the processing of declarations, Federal Trade Commission review etc.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
(Email documents@brokerpower.com for a copy of the amendment.)
Amendment would cut:
Would Require Certification Process for Legal Plant/Products
The amendment cut a provision that a standard certification process be established for plant and plant products legally harvested, imported, or manufactured after May 22, 2008, that considers individual item certification and individual manufacturer, importer, and retailer certification for purposes of sale and resale.
1st “Knowing” Plant Offense Penalty Reductions
An amendment to the bill removed provisions that would have reduced the penalty for first violations.
Would Require Adequate Funding for Declaration Processing, Etc.
The amendment struck requirements that the head of each Federal agency responsible for implementing the Lacey Act Amendments allocate sufficient amounts of resources (from amounts otherwise available) for the processing of all declarations and other requirements.
FTC Would Review Competitiveness of Raw Materials Market for Instruments
The amendment also pulled a requirement that180 days after the enactment of this bill, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would a review the competitiveness in the domestic market for raw materials for the manufacture of musical instruments and the impact of the amendments made by this bill to the Lacey Act Amendments on such competitiveness, and submit a report to Congress containing the results of the review.
The bill would still:
Exempt Pre-2008 Plants/Products from Lacey Act
The bill would amend the Lacey Act so that it would not apply to (1) any plant that was imported into the U.S. before May 22, 2008 (the effective date of the 2008 Lacey Act Amendments1) or to (2) any finished plant or plant product assembled and processed before that date.
Limit Lacey Declaration to Plants Entered for Consumption
This bill would also amend the declaration requirement to limit it to plants that are entered for consumption.
Declarations for Tree Products Would Need Less Info Unless Solid Wood
In the case of a plant product that is derived from a tree, the declaration would not need to include the scientific name of the plant, value of the import, quantity of the plant, and country where the plant was taken, unless the plant product is solid wood, as would be defined by APHIS.
FWS Would Evaluate Possible Database of Foreign Laws
This bill would require APHIS to issue a report to Congress evaluating the feasibility of creating and maintaining a publicly available database of laws of foreign countries from which plants are exported.
(Currently, APHIS provides a list of four websites that may be useful to look-up the scientific names of plants: the PLANTS Database (here), GRIN Taxonomy for Plants (here), Integrated Taxonomic Information System (here), and the International Plant Names Index (here).)
1The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill) was effective May 22, 2008 and amended the Lacey Act by expanding its protection to a broader range of plants and plant products. The Lacey Act now, among other things, makes it unlawful, beginning December 15, 2008, to import certain plants and plant products without an import declaration. (See ITT's Online Archives 08100805 for summary.)
(See ITT's Online Archives 11042816 for summary of an APHIS guidance document on Special Use Codes, which states that goods manufactured prior to the 2008 amendments with materials that are untraceable, despite due diligence, should use a Genus Code of "Special" and a Species Code of "PreAmendment" on the declaration.
See ITT's Online Archives 11063014 for summary of APHIS' June 2011 advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) seeking proposals to address problems with the implementation of the Lacey Act declaration requirement.
See ITT's Online Archives 11092603 for summary of trade associations' comments on APHIS' June 2011 ANPR, many of which supported the use of Special Use Codes for products of plant materials harvested or manufactured prior to the 2008 amendments, among other things.
See ITT's Online Archives 11092020 and 11090727 for summaries of a "filled out" sample of and APHIS pointers on the new Lacey Declaration Form PPQ 505.)
Text of HR-3210 as introduced is available here.
(See ITT's Online Archives 11102514 for summary of the bill as introduced)