In Airflow Technology, Inc. v. U.S., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the classification decision to the Court of International Trade to determine whether Sperifilt, a filter media used to filter dirt and other particles in air filtration systems should be classified under HTS 5911.90.00 or 5603.94.90.
The following Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Court of International Trade cases on international trade issues were dated/decided during April 4 - 29, 2008:
The Supreme Court will hear the case on whether antidumping duties can be imposed on a French supplier of low-enriched uranium (LEU) during its October 2008 term.
In Nufarm America's Inc., v. U.S., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Court of International Trade's determination that 19 CFR 181.53 does not violate the "Export Clause" of the Constitution.
In two March 2008 rulings titled Warner-Lambert Companyv. U.S, the Court of International Trade ruled that mints invoiced as Powerful Mints Spearmint, Certs Peppermint Standard, and Certs Spearmint Standard should be classified as a preparation for oral or dental hygiene under HTS heading 3306.
On March 5, 2008, a Commerce Department Assistant Secretary testified before the Senate on the effect of a Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision, Eurodif, S.A., et al. v. U.S., on the recent amendment to the U.S.-Russia antidumping suspension agreement on low-enriched uranium (LEU).
The following Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Court of International Trade cases on international trade issues were dated/decided during March 19 - 24, 2008:
The following Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Court of International Trade cases on international trade issues were dated/decided during March 3 - March 19, 2008:
The following Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Court of International Trade cases on international trade issues were dated/decided during February 25 - March 3, 2008:
The Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit has affirmed an earlier judgment by the Court of International Trade that the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (CDSOA), often referred to as the "Byrd Amendment," does not apply to imports from Canada and Mexico.