The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of March 6-12:
No new lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 27 - March 5, nor were any appeals of CIT decisions filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during that week.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 20-26:
The Court of International Trade on Feb. 28 dismissed parts of an importer’s lawsuit challenging CBP’s tariff classification of its graduated compression hosiery, arm sleeves and gauntlets (here). While the classification of other models remains to be decided, CIT ruled importer Sigvaris cannot contest the classification of certain lines of compression hosiery and arm sleeves because they were not listed in supplements to the importer’s protests or were not listed in documents during the case’s discovery phase.
Three members of a conspiracy to smuggle counterfeit Apple iPhones, iPads and iPods from China pleaded guilty Feb. 22 in New Jersey U.S. District Court, the Justice Department said (here). Andreina Becerra, Roberto Volpe and Rosario La Marca conspired to smuggle into the U.S. more than 40,000 counterfeit electronic devices from 2009 to 2014. They shipped the devices separately from the labels bearing the counterfeit Apple trademarks for later assembly to avoid detection by CBP officials, DOJ said. Becerra, Volpe and La Marca each pleaded guilty to counts of conspiracy, trafficking in counterfeit goods, smuggling and structuring of financial transactions.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 13-19:
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 6-12:
The lengthy detention of some $25 million worth of aluminum products falls within the government's broad authority to control the movement of cargo through seaports, the Justice Department said in a Feb. 10 filing with the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California's Eastern Division. The court filing was in response to a lawsuit filed by Perfectus Aluminum over the detention of aluminum goods in September (see 1701130033). While the Perfectus suit claimed that CBP's detentions of the goods was costing the company millions of dollars before any seizure or forfeiture proceeding began, the containers were seized soon after the company filed, the DOJ said.
A company that sold Nicaraguan cheese in transit before entry cannot claim Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) benefits on the cheese because it is not the importer, even though it is still listed as importer of record on entry documentation, the Court of International Trade said in a recent decision (here).
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Jan. 30 - Feb. 5: