The Court of International Trade dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Sunshine International Trading’s challenge of CBP’s refusal of an entry of women’s apparel. Sunshine said the refusal was a protestable exclusion, and the company’s argument was bolstered by CBP’s mistaken denial, rather than rejection, of the subsequent protest. But CIT ruled that the refusal wasn’t a protestable final action, so the case couldn’t be tried under 28 USC 1581(a) denied protest jurisdiction. Sunshine’s valuation challenge was also dismissed because valuation can only be protested after liquidation, and the court found an error in the dates listed on the entry rejection to be an irrelevant clerical error.

A citizen of Ukraine pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the Arms Export Control Act by attempting to export military-grade night vision equipment from the U.S. to Ukraine, said Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE agents arrested Volodomyr Ponomarenko while attempting to enter the U.S. on March 23, 2011. Ponomarenko faces up to five years in prison at sentencing.

The Court of International Trade sustained the selection of Indonesia as surrogate country in the 2009-10 antidumping duty administrative review of floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables and certain parts thereof from China (A-570-888), despite a challenge from Foshan Shunde Yongjian that the International Trade Administration should have instead picked India. According to Yongjian, the selection of Indonesia arbitrarily broke a long chain of China reviews that used India as surrogate country, and was effectively a change in methodology without the required notice and comment period. The court disagreed, finding the selection to be consistent with the methodology of prior reviews, and finding the use of Indonesia as surrogate country to be reasonable based on record evidence.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a lower court criminal conviction of two importers for failure to redeliver shipments of dairy products to CBP that the Food and Drug Administration had found to be adulterated. Although the defendants admitted to distributing and selling the merchandise after CBP had demanded redelivery, and with knowledge that the dairy products were contaminated with bacteria, the 11th circuit found that they were only liable for civil penalties, and not subject to prison sentences. According to the court, 19 CFR 141.113(c) on redelivery of FDA-regulated merchandise is clear in providing only for liquidated damages capped at three times the value of the merchandise.

The Court of International Trade sustained the results of a remand of the 2006-07 antidumping duty administrative review of chlorinated isocyanurates from China (A-570-898). CIT had remanded in November 2011, in response to a challenge by two domestic producers to the data used by the International Trade Administration for calculation of surrogate values. The ITA had been directed to reconsider values used for urea, steam coal and ammonia gas by-products. After reconsideration, the ITA made no changes, and the court accepted the agency’s reasoning over the arguments of the domestic producers.

The Court of International Trade sustained the International Trade Commission’s final injury determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of certain coated paper suitable for high-quality print graphics using sheet-fed presses from China (A-570-958 / C-570-959) and Indonesia (A-560-823 / C-860-824). The ITC unanimously found threat of injury to U.S. industry, which resulted in AD/CV duty orders on the merchandise. Several Chinese and Indonesian companies argued that the ITC did not properly consider all nine factors required by applicable law in making its decision, but CIT found the ITC may focus its analysis and need not consider all nine. The foreign plaintiffs failed to argue why consideration of the omitted factors would have resulted in a different outcome, CIT said. CIT also ruled against plaintiffs’ arguments that several other aspects of the ITC’s determination were unsupported by evidence and based on conjecture.

The Court of International Trade dismissed Dependable Packaging Solutions’ classification challenge, ruling that CBP correctly classified the company’s vases in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule as decorative glassware. Dependable argued that because it sold its vases to mass-market flower packing houses, where they were filled and sold to retailers for final sale as a unit, they should have been classified as glass containers for packaging. Noting that the relevant tariff headings referred to principal use, the court disagreed because it found no difference between Dependable’s vases and others sold directly to consumers for decorative use.

Five individuals and two domestic honey processing companies were charged with falsifying entry documents on honey imported from China, and transshipping through other countries, to evade antidumping and duties on the merchandise, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement reported. The seven defendants allegedly evaded antidumping duties totaling more than $180 million, it said.

The former president of the International Longshoremen's Association Local 1526 and his executive assistant were indicted on charges of conspiracy to steal money, funds, property, and other assets of the union local, said the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. The 17-count indictment and the arrests of defendants Darryl Brice Payne, a/k/a Darryl "Mike D," Payne, 47, of Sunrise, and Tianni Latrice Brown, f/k/a Tianni Latrice Wade, 31, of Lauderhill, Fla., last week.

The owner of a tile and tile cutting and milling company in Miami was sentenced to 12 months in home confinement for his role in a scheme to defraud Export-Import Bank of the U.S. of nearly $141,053, said the Ex-Im Office of Inspector General. It said Diego Pinzon-Villamil, 51, was sentenced Feb. 14 in U.S. District Court, Miami. He also was sentenced to 36 months of supervised release and was ordered to pay $141,053 in restitution. Pinzon pleaded guilty on November 28 to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of wire fraud in connection with a scheme to defraud Ex-Im Bank. According to court documents, Pinzon's Ceramic Tile USA purported to be in the business of exporting tile and tile cutting equipment to South America, but Pinzon admitted that he and co-conspirators created false invoices, shipping documents, financial statements, and other documents that were ultimately submitted to Ex-Im Bank to insure the financial transaction.