On April 26, 2011, the Justice Department announced that two former executives of Paris-based Société Air France were indicted for participating in a conspiracy to fix and coordinate surcharges on air cargo shipments to and from the U.S. and on air cargo service rates in the U.S. and elsewhere.

In response to a Court of International Trade remand on the final results of the antidumping duty investigation of certain steel threaded rod from China, the International Trade Administration reconsidered the exclusion of financial data for an Indian pre-stressed concrete wire products manufacturer from the normal value calculation, conceding that the Indian firm did make “comparable merchandise.” With the resulting altered normal value, the dumping margin declined from 55.16% to 47.37% for Chinese producer/exporters Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co., Ltd, a.k.a. Brother Standard Parts Co., Ltd., IFI & Morgan Ltd., and RMB Fasteners Ltd. (Slip Op. 11-44, dated 04/21/11)

In remand results for the antidumping duty administrative review of certain cased pencils from China for the period of December 1, 2006 through November 30, 2007, the ITA revised its labor rate value for Chinese pencil manufacturers, using a more narrowly defined set of market economy countries at levels of economic development more comparable to that of China. Producer/exporter Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. then argued that the ITA should use only a single country for wage rates, as it does for other factors of production, but the Court of International Trade ruled the complaint “groundless,” since using multiple countries for wage rates is specifically required by the agency’s regulations. However, the CIT found the ITA’s exclusion of detailed, relevant wage rate data for Indian wood products makers to be inconsistent and unjustified, and further dismissed as “absurd” the ITA’s decision to identify as “significant producers” a number of small countries with only nominal exports of pencils, such as the Maldives, with $67 of exports. The court accordingly remanded these aspects of the determination to the ITA. (Slip Op. 11-45, dated 04/21/11)

Through four successive remand determinations on the second sunset review of antidumping duty orders on ball bearings from France, Germany, Italy and Japan, the International Trade Commission maintained that imports of ball bearings would injure domestic injury in the absence of the AD order. But after the Court of International Trade directed the ITC to “point to particular data in the record and rationally connect it to the underlying determinations,” the agency reversed its position, concluding that imports “are not likely to have a significant impact on the industry upon revocation” of the order. The CIT upheld this revised determination and declined to adjudicate other issues, noting that the government plans to appeal the new ruling upholding revocation. (See ITT’s Online Archives or 01/03/11 news, 11010316, for BP summary of the court’s preceding remand instructions to the ITC.) (Slip Op. 11-43, dated 04/20/11)

On April 21, 2011, Attorney General Holder announced the formation of the Oil and Gas Fraud Working Group which will monitor oil and gas markets for potential violations of criminal or civil laws. The Working Group will explore whether there is any evidence of manipulation of oil and gas prices, collusion, fraud, or misrepresentations at the retail or wholesale levels that violate state or federal laws and harm consumers or the federal government.

In Canadian Wheat Board, et al. v. U.S., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Court of International Trade decision that the U.S. government cannot retain unliquidated antidumping and countervailing duties that were deposited prior to the revocation of an AD or CV duty order, and that the duty depositors are entitled to a return of those duties.

In Canadian Wheat Board, et al. v. U.S., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed the Court of International Trade's finding that the government cannot retain antidumping duties after a North American Free Trade Agreement binational panel has invalidated the AD duty order on hard red spring wheat from Canada and the International Trade Administration has revoked the order, and that the depositors can recover them, although the invalidated duties had been deposited prior to the date of that determination and had not been liquidated. (See future issue of ITT for details.)

Following the second remand results in the antidumping duty administrative review of fresh garlic from China for the period November 2001 - October 2002, Jinan Yipin Corporation contested the International Trade Administration’s cardboard and labor surrogate values and alleged other errors, while the ITA requested a voluntary remand to revise the value to conform with an appeals court ruling that found the ITA’s prior method of calculating Chinese labor costs to be illegal. The Court of International Trade denied Jinan Yipin’s complaints and upheld the ITA’s remand results methodologies, but granted the ITA a voluntary remand to revise labor costs. (See ITT’s Online Archives or 11/09/09 news, 09110935, for BP summary of second remand decision. See ITT’s Online Archives or 05/19/10 news, 10051935, for BP summary of the CAFC decision overturning ITA’s use of certain labor cost values.) (Slip Op. 11-36, dated 04/12/11)

The American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. sought to participate as defendant-intervenors in a lawsuit brought by Chinese furniture makers following an antidumping duty scope ruling by the International Trade Administration in wooden bedroom furniture from China. These domestic producers had filed an appearance in the agency scope review and were thus legally an “interested party,” but did not submit argument or evidence in the review. The Court of International Trade ruled the domestic producers therefore had not gained rights as a “party to proceeding” at court, which requires participating, “through written submissions of factual information or written argument, in a segment of a proceeding.” (Slip Op. 11-40, dated 04/14/11)

A 2009 remand decision from the Court of International Trade found fault with the methods of the International Trade Administration in ruling that a New York importer’s collapsible hand cart, purportedly designed for luggage and sales samples, fell within the scope of the antidumping duty order on hand trucks and certain parts thereof from China even though the order excludes most collapsible carts. However, after the ITA, on remand, conducted some simple tests of the disputed cart’s ability to slide under loads, the court found that the agency had acted correctly, and upheld the scope ruling. (See ITT’s Online Archives or 11/23/09 news, 09112360, for BP summary of earlier court decision.) (Slip Op. 11-37, dated 04/12/11)