The Commerce Department properly hit exporter Kumar Industries with a 13.61% adverse facts available dumping rate due to the respondent's "inadequate explanations" regarding one of its partners' ownership interest in two unnamed companies, companies A and B, the Court of International Trade ruled in a Nov. 22 opinion. Judge Timothy Stanceu sustained the rate as part of the first antidumping duty review on glycine from India, finding that Kumar "raised more questions than it answered" in its submissions, preventing Commerce from conducting a proper affiliate analysis.
The Court of International Trade in a Nov. 27 opinion sustained the Commerce Department's finding that ship building company Nur Gemicilik ve Tic, an affiliate of countervailing duty respondent Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret, is not Kaptan's cross-owned input supplier. Judge Gary Katzmann upheld Commerce's finding that Nur's steel scrap was not necessarily primarily dedicated to Kaptan's rebar production, and its consideration of Nur's business activities as part of this analysis.
Members of the World Trade Organization's Work Program of the MC12 Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Declaration agreed to finalize the factual summary of the report detailing findings of the work program ahead of the 13th Ministerial Conference in February, the WTO announced Nov. 17. During the Nov. 15-17 meeting of the SPS Committee, members "agreed to continue efforts to build consensus on the report to be presented" at MC13.
All of Judge Pauline Newman's claims against her colleagues on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's investigation of her fitness to continue serving on the bench are "straightforwardly dismissed," judges Kimberly Moore, Sharon Prost and Richard Taranto said in a reply brief supporting their motion to dismiss the case (Hon. Pauline Newman v. Hon Kimberly Moore, D.D.C. # 23-01334).
The Court of International Trade properly said that importer Nature's Touch Frozen Foods frozen fruit mixture entries are classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 0811.90.80 as "Fruit ... frozen," the U.S. told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a Nov. 21 reply brief. The trade court "committed no legal error in interpreting" the terms "fruit," "other" and "food preparations" since the terms are defined by "dictionaries, Explanatory Notes, and legal standards" set by the Federal Circuit and other courts, the government said (Nature's Touch Frozen Foods (West) v. United States, Fed. Cir. # 23-2093).
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit "unequivocally held" that the Commerce Department could deduct Section 232 national security duties from U.S. price in antidumping duty cases, the U.S. argued in a Nov. 17 supplemental brief at the Court of International Trade.
Uzbekistan has ramped up World Trade Organization accession process, the WTO announced. Since the last working party meeting, which took place in March, Uzbekistan "has sustained its technical engagement" on both the bilateral and multilateral fronts, submitted a host of updated documents for the next working party meeting, and "introduced a number of critical policy and institutional measures" to ramp up talks, South Korea's Ambassador Yun Seong-deok, who chairs the working party, said. Uzbekistan's Deputy Prime Minister Jamshid Khodjayev laid out various institutional changes to move the negotiations forward, including "the establishment of a special department in the Ministry of Justice for ensuring compliance with WTO rules and the creation of WTO divisions in 20 ministries and agencies."
The U.S. Supreme Court will hold oral argument Jan. 17 in a pivotal case on the Chevron deference principle. Under Chevron, agencies' interpretation of statutes are approved with minimal oversight should the statute prove ambiguous. U.S. trade agencies often champion the doctrine in their enforcement of antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings. The Supreme Court granted writ of certiorari in November 2022 to hear a case on Chevron from a group of commercial fishing companies. Justice Neil Gorsuch criticized Chevron deference in a November 2022 dissenting opinion (see 2211080058) (Loper Bright Enterprises v. Gina Raimondo, Sup. Ct. # 22-451).
American tool maker Stanley Black & Decker moved to toss its case challenging President Donald Trump's expansion of Section 232 steel and aluminum duties onto "derivative" products after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the move in a separate case from PrimeSource Building Products. Stanley Black & Decker said it's "no longer necessary for" the Court of International Trade to render a decision in the case, which has been stayed pending resolution of PrimeSource's case. The tool maker moved to toss the case despite a second petition at the Supreme Court from exporter Oman Fasteners (see 2311010052). The trade court granted the motion to dismiss the same day (Stanley Black & Decker v. U.S., CIT # 21-00262).
The Commerce Department rejected arguments from antidumping duty petitioners, led by Ellwood City Forge Co., regarding "alternative pathways" for the agency to make a particular market situation adjustment for two inputs of forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany. Submitting its remand results to the Court of International Trade on Nov. 21, Commerce said that while it reversed course on its ability to make a cost-based PMS adjustment, it won't be able to make a sales-based PMS adjustment since it was untimely filed (Ellwood City Forge Co. v. United States, CIT # 21-00077).