The Biden administration is still working through a sweeping review of its arms transfer policies, which is expected to place more of an emphasis on human rights concerns while helping to remove foreign barriers to U.S. defense exporters, said Tim Betts, a senior State Department official. He said the agency is in the middle of an “intensive” interagency process and “wide ranging” discussions with industry and Congress to determine how best to revise its conventional arms transfer policies, which could represent a more cautious approach compared with the previous administration.
The Bureau of Industry and Security added four technology companies in Israel, Russia and Singapore to the Entity List for “acting contrary” to U.S. foreign policy and national security through “malicious cyber activities,” BIS said in a notice released Nov. 3. The companies either operate or supply technologies in the cyberintelligence and information security sectors and will be subject to a license review policy of presumption of denial for all items subject to the Export Administration Regulations. No license exceptions will be available for controlled exports to the four companies. The additions are effective Nov. 4.
Although companies shouldn’t expect the Treasury Department's recently released sanctions review to lead to major policy changes, it could result in slightly fewer designations, clearer humanitarian exemptions and more sanctions guidance, law firms said.
The new Department of Justice enforcement and disclosure policies (see 2110280051) could substantially increase scrutiny on corporate trade violators, law firms said, especially those with a history of misconduct. The policies, announced last week by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, revealed the Biden administration’s “extensive agenda that is designed to be tough” on corporations, Wiley Rein said, and may foreshadow more changes. “As she made clear,” the firm said Oct. 29, “the Biden DOJ is serious about revamping corporate enforcement and this is just the first wave of reform.”
“Very few” of the Chinese military’s artificial intelligence equipment suppliers face specific U.S. export controls, allowing China’s defense industry access to a range of sensitive U.S. technologies, Georgetown’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology said in an October report. The absence of specific export restrictions over AI suppliers highlights significant “gaps” in U.S. export control policies, the report said, and could lead to “lapses in due diligence” by U.S. exporters.
The U.S. should continue to impose export controls on advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment and machinery but be careful about restricting sales of finished semiconductor products to China, Chinese economics and technology policy experts said. Controls on finished products may risk hurting U.S. semiconductor exporters and would not stop China from importing those goods elsewhere, they said.
The Bureau of Industry and Security plans to implement more emerging technology controls during this fiscal year, Karen Nies-Vogel, BIS’s director of the Office of Exporter Services, said, speaking briefly during an Oct. 28 meeting of the Emerging Technology Technical Advisory Committee. Nies-Vogel said the agency has so far issued 38 emerging technology controls and is “looking forward” to implementing more in the coming months and “years to come.”
The Department of Justice this week announced new initiatives to “strengthen” its enforcement of corporate crime, which could have wide-ranging effects on cases involving export controls, sanctions and foreign bribery violations. The initiatives were presented by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco as “changes” to the agency’s enforcement policies, including how DOJ will calculate mitigation when assessing penalties, how it will weigh past misconduct for unrelated violations and how it will use independent monitors to ensure compliance with settlement agreements.
Shippers were caught off guard by a new surcharge announced this week by the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports that could exacerbate unfair detention and demurrage fees, members of the Federal Maritime Commission’s Shipper Advisory Committee said. The ports announced a surcharge to ocean carriers for containers that dwell at terminals, a fee that will likely be passed on to shippers, members said during the committee’s inaugural meeting Oct. 27 (see 2109100008 and 2110140001).
Although the Bureau of Industry and Security's new export controls on cybersecurity items are intended to restrict only malicious exports, they could place wide-ranging compliance burdens on the entire cybersecurity sector, law firms said. Technology companies and others operating in the sector still have time to convince BIS to narrow the scope of the rule, which takes effect in January but contains several “ambiguities,” firms said.