GOP Commissioners Dissent on FCC Foreign-Sponsored Content Rule

2022 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruling against the agency regarding its foreign-sponsored content rules (see 2207120069). The order replaces a requirement that broadcasters check federal databases for each entity leasing time on their stations to see if they are registered foreign agents. Instead, broadcasters have two options for showing that they tried to determine if the programming is foreign-government sponsored. The order also clarifies that the FCC's foreign-sponsorship rules don't apply generally to ad sales for commercial goods and services. Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel in a statement said the rules clarification makes clear that if a foreign government pays to broadcast programming or campaign advertising, a disclosure would clarify that the government paid for it. The clarification "is about supporting transparency and democratic values," she said. "As listeners, viewers, and citizens, this is something we are entitled to know." Carr and Simington objected to new definitions in the order. "While this Order fixes one legal infirmity highlighted at the D.C. Circuit, it creates new problems that may require us to revisit our foreign sponsorship rules in a future proceeding following another appeal," Carr said. Simington said the order's new definitions of "lease of airtime" and "short-form advertising" go against past definitions and violate the Administrative Procedure Act. He said the FCC rule also covers the same ground as Federal Elections Commission rules prohibiting foreign sponsorship.