Trade-Related Court Cases Recently Filed
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
Risen Solar Technology Sdn. Bhd., challenging the Commerce Department's final scope and anti-circumvention determinations regarding the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. #23-00194. Filed Sept. 18.
Canadian Solar International Limited, challenging Commerce's final scope and anti-circumvention determinations regarding the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. #23-00195. Filed Sept. 18.
Trina Solar Science & Technology (Thailand) Ltd., challenging Commerce's final scope and anti-circumvention determinations regarding the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. #23-00196. Filed Sept. 18.
Trina Solar (Vietnam) Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Trina Solar Energy Development Company Limited, and Trina Solar Co., Ltd., challenging Commerce's final scope and anti-circumvention determinations regarding the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. #23-00197. Filed Sept. 18.
Red Sun Energy Long An Company Limited, challenging Commerce's final scope and anti-circumvention determinations regarding the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. #23-00198. Filed Sept. 18.
Lin Engineering, Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its electric motors of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheadings 8501.10.6080 and 8501.31.4000, dutiable at 2.8% and 4%, respectively, and secondary subheading 9903.88.02, should be classified under secondary subheading 9903.88.67, free from the 25% Section 301 tariffs. #23-00199. Filed Sept. 19.
HH Associates US Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its glassware of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 7013.37.2090, dutiable at 22.5%, should be classified under subheading 7013.37.2090, free of duty. #23-00200. Filed Sept. 19.