Broadcasters Disagree on FM6 Future
Broadcasters disagreed whether the number of FM6 “Franken FM” stations should be allowed to expand and whether interference protections for Channel 6 should be rolled back, in reply comments posted Tuesday in docket 03-185. Incumbent noncommercial educational stations should be…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
allowed to move to Channel 200, NPR said. A “narrow proposal” to loosen interference protections “provides the framework" to benefit the public "without harming either group of licensees,” NPR said. There has been no interference testing involving ATSC 3.0 receivers, NAB said. “NAB urges the Commission to retain the existing channel 6 protection requirements at this time.” Disney and its station WPVI-TV Philadelphia also said interference protections should remain in place. Interference concerns about NCE stations on Channel 6 are based on outdated technology, said the Educational Media Foundation. “EMF, in all of its years of operating its reserved-band FM stations in Channel 6 markets, has yet to see any substantial interference caused to a Channel 6 station -- particularly since the digital transition.” A group of public media entities said the FCC should reject any proposals that would repurpose TV spectrum or threaten its integrity. “Any modification” of TV Channel 6 protection requirements “would run the risk not only of FM radio stations causing interference to current TV reception, but also causing material constraints on the availability of spectrum for television,” said America’s Public Television Stations, PBS and others. The record shows the FCC should allow new FM6 stations, said LPTV broadcaster Cocola Broadcasting. “It is purely speculative whether other stations would introduce new interference.” A group of existing FM6 licensees disagreed. “It is reasonable to limit FM6 service at this time to those stations with a significant history of FM6 service,” said the Preserve Community Programming Coalition. LPFM group REC Networks also objected to expanding FM6. “FM6 licensees have no true accountability to their communities through the lack of a public file requirement and have even fewer accountability requirements than LPFM stations,” REC said.