DOJ Seeks Dismissal of FCC Staffer's Workplace Retaliation Suit

in a motion (in Pacer) Friday in U.S. District Court in Washington seeking summary judgment on Sharon Stewart's complaint. DOJ said that while the FCC doesn't condone its workers looking at nude or semi-nude images in their cubicles, that Stewart sometimes caught a glimpse doesn't create a hostile work environment -- especially when a co-worker doing such viewing tried to hide the images from her. Instead, the plaintiff is "cobbl[ing] together a hostile work environment claim" even though the viewing habits weren't directed at all at her. It said there's no evidence that no one took any action on Stewart's complaint because of her gender or other protected characteristic, as a hostile work environment claim requires. The agency also said that while Stewart has argued she was denied performance bonuses in 2012 and 2015 as a form of retaliation, she also was disciplined for misconduct in both of those years, so the FCC "had a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for its actions." Justice disputed that Stewart was retaliated against when she was relieved of her duties regarding Section 610 reports -- annual lists of 10-year-old agency reports -- since the reports were put on hold for years and no one at the FCC was doing them. Regardless, removal of such administrative responsibilities doesn't count as materially adverse since there is no proof they would have resulted in Stewart's being promoted, DOJ said. The motion also retells multiple past equal employment opportunity and other complaints Stewart filed against co-workers and supervisors when she worked at the Department of Health and Human Services and then at the FCC since starting there in 2001. Stewart's counsel, Noah Peters of Bailey & Ehrenberg, emailed us Monday, "We look forward to responding to the Agency’s motion and are confident we will prevail."