International Trade Today is a Warren News publication.

EFF: Facebook Should Be Transparent About U.S. Takedown Requests

Facebook's website lists the number of content restrictions the company has complied with for countries including Brazil, India, Israel and Turkey, but the amount of content Facebook blocks in the U.S. is unknown, wrote Electronic Frontier Foundation Investigative Researcher Dave…

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.

Maass in a blog post Thursday. That this information is missing in the U.S. is “odd, considering that Facebook has been suspending the accounts of inmates for at least four years at the behest of prison officials,” he said. EFF’s issue isn’t about prisoner accounts removed from Facebook, but EFF is concerned if the company isn’t reporting these takedown requests that it's censoring other information as well, Maass said. In California and South Carolina alone, more than 700 takedowns were requested for accounts belonging to prisoners, he said. Even if EFF or another outlet filed a public records request in all 50 states, the true number of prisoner takedowns Facebook complied with may not be known because “Facebook’s system allowed prisons to file these requests without creating a paper trail,” Maass said. In EFF’s annual scorecard evaluating how companies handle government requests, Google and Twitter transparency efforts were applauded, he said. While EFF was preparing its 2015 report, “we gave Facebook multiple opportunities to come clean about government requests to suppress content,” he said. Facebook “did overhaul its inmate takedown process,” but “refuses to release top line numbers for the United States,” Maass said. He urged Facebook to “publish the data and show U.S. government agencies that censorship shouldn’t happen in the dark.” The company didn't comment.