Details of CBP's Proposed Rule to Preclude Drawback for Unpaid Excise Taxes, Add Associated Bond Condition
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has issued a proposed rule to amend 19 CFR to preclude the filing of a substitution drawback claim1 for Federal excise tax2 paid on imported merchandise in situations where (1) no excise tax was paid on the substituted merchandise or where (2) the substituted merchandise is the subject of a different claim for refund or drawback of Internal Revenue Code taxes.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
Written comments on CBP's proposed rule are due by November 16, 2009.
Drawback Would be Limited to Amount of Taxes Paid on Substitute Merchandise
CBP is proposing to amend the requirements for substitution drawback in 19 CFR 191.32 to add a new requirement that would limit, for purposes of drawback of Federal excise tax3, drawback granted on the export or destruction of substituted merchandise to the amount of taxes paid (and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the substitute merchandise.
Associated Bond Condition Would be Added
CBP is proposing to amend the basic importation and entry bond conditions in 19 CFR 113.62 to add a new condition under which the principal would agree not to file, or transfer to a successor the right to file, a substitution drawback claim that would be inconsistent with the terms of the proposed limit on substitution drawback claims (discussed above).
(CBP is proposing to designate this new bond condition as 19 CFR 113.62(m) and to redesignate current paragraph (m) in 19 CFR 113.62 as paragraph (n).)
CBP notes that the consequences of default specified in the proposed redesignated 19 CFR 113.62(n) would apply in the case of a breach of this new bond condition.
TTB Issues Proposed Rule to Make Conforming Regulatory Changes
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau has also issued a proposed rule to amend its regulations to clarify the relationship between tax payment under the IRC and drawback of tax under the Tariff Act of 1930. TTB's proposed rule would make conforming amendments to reflect CBP's proposed regulations. Written comments on TTB's proposed rule are due by December 14, 2009.
(Note that CBP states its proposed amendments still allow for the return of 99% of the duties, taxes, and fees that are paid on the imported merchandise upon export, or when IRC excise taxes have been paid on substituted domestic product and the substituted merchandise is not the subject of a separate claim for refund or drawback of such taxes.)
1Substitution drawback," is a type of drawback that permits other merchandise to be substituted for the imported merchandise for purposes of satisfying the exportation or destruction requirement.
2Federal excise taxes are imposed on the manufacture and distribution of certain non-essential consumer goods, such as distilled spirits, wines, beer (IRC Chapter 51), tobacco products (IRC Chapter 52), imported taxable fuel (IRC Chapter 32) and petroleum products (IRC Chapter 38).
3Referred to in proposed 19 CFR 191.32(b)(4) as internal revenue tax imposed under IRC Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52.
(See ITT's Online Archives or 09/14/09 news, 09101405, for previous BP summary of CBP proposed rule.)
- CBP comments due by 11/16/09
- TTB comments due by 12/14/09
CBP contact - William Rosoff (202) 325-0047
CBP proposed rule (USCBP-2009-0021, FR Pub 10/15/09) available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-24789.pdf.
TTB propose rule (TTB-2009-0005, Notice No. 100, FR Pub 10/15/09) available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-24791.pdf.