Sprint PCS became latest carrier to drop out of FCC’s C- and F-block auction, which resumed Thurs. and reached $12.01 billion in net high bids. Sprint’s bidding eligibility was reduced to zero after 27 rounds Thurs., FCC said. Lehman Bros. research note issued before auction resumed after holiday hiatus said Sprint was among carriers likely to abandon bidding, path already taken by Nextel and several other carriers since auction started Dec. 12. (Bidding was suspended between Dec. 22 and Thurs. for holidays). Lehman said Sprint PCS didn’t place bids Dec. 21, using waivers instead. “It seems as if Sprint PCS feels the prices are too high and is going to exit the auction shortly after bidding resumes,” Lehman said. Following CDMA agreement with Palm, Sprint shares soared 15.41% Thurs. to close at $23.88. (Pact covers Sprint’s provision of first CDMA solutions for Palm’s handheld devices). Meanwhile, Verizon maintained strong lead with $4.06 billion in net high bids, followed by AT&T-backed designated entity Alaska Native Wireless with $2.67 billion and Cingular Wireless-backed Salmon PCS with $2.19 billion. Verizon Wireless had been high bidder for 2 N.Y. licenses for last several rounds, but ended Thurs. with high bid for only one license at $968.6 million. Alaska Native Wireless bid $716.57 million for another N.Y. license, with Salmon PCS vying for 3rd with $714.45 million. Lehman Bros. indicated auction could wrap up in several weeks. DCC PCS placed high bid of $519.7 million for L.A. license. Verizon also placed high bids for licenses in L.A., Chicago, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Boston, Seattle. Alaska Native Wireless placed high bid for L.A. and Salmon for Atlanta. In top 15 markets, VoiceStream had high bid for Washington license.
As FCC continued to wrestle with imposing additional regulatory conditions on AOL’s pending purchase of Time Warner (TW), Microsoft and other online rivals of AOL pressed their furious campaign for instant messaging (IM) requirements. In latest letter to FCC Chmn. Kennard Thurs., Microsoft called again for “imposition of a meaningful and enforceable condition that facilitates IM interoperability by enabling consumers to communicate with each other regardless of the IM system they use.” Along with brief letter, Microsoft and its allies sent 2-page fact sheet listing 8 consumer groups, 53 companies and associations, 10 senators, 12 House members and 7 publications that are calling for IM interoperability. At minimum, Microsoft argued in separate filing with FCC Tues., “the Commission should obligate AOL to enter into multiple contracts with leading IM providers to allow for interoperability prior to offering any advanced services over the broadband infrastructure of Time Warner’s cable systems.” In earlier filing with Commission, nationwide group of ISPs that had brought class action lawsuit over AOL’s 5.0 and 6.0 software urged agency to force company to modify its offending software feature. They argued that regulatory condition changing that feature, which directs modem calls away from user’s desired ISP to AOL access number, “would do more to introduce competition in Internet access than the instant messaging condition that has been the subject of recent press reports.” Meanwhile, new op-ed piece published by Cato Institute said FTC’s open access conditions on AOL-TW merger would hurt consumers and hamper competition and innovation by dampening incentives for rivals to build competing high-speed data systems. “The entire forced access campaign is an unfortunate example of unelected regulators overstepping their bounds,” wrote Clyde Crews, Cato technology studies dir. “They are exploiting their power over industries to make regulatory ‘law’ that should require an act of Congress. Forced access represents a regrettable new incarnation of industrial policy.”
Qwest proposed settlement of pending Ariz. class action lawsuit filed against its predecessor, U S West, that would give credits ranging from $15 to almost $1,500 to estimated 300,000 customers who have suffered phone installation delays in last 8 years. Qwest filed $22 million settlement offer Wed. in Maricopa County Court, offering to compensate customers who suffered service installation delays between Jan. 1, 1993, and Nov. 20, 2000. Court hearing on settlement offer will be April 23. Current Qwest customers would get automatic bill credit while former customers would receive checks. Residential refund would range from $15 for 4-day delay to $880 if delay exceeded 5 months. Business refund would range from $59 to $1,465 per line. Credits for delay on additional residential lines would be $3. Qwest wouldn’t have to admit wrongdoing. Ariz. suit is outgrowth of original suit filed in 1997 in Denver alleging U S West had diverted resources from local service to fund new wireless and cable ventures, contrary to customer interests. Qwest last year settled Colo. suit for $36 million in refunds to 244,000 customers and similar N.M. suit for $6 million to 70,000 customers.
Several members of Congress got off to fast starts this week, introducing Internet-related bills on familiar topics within days of returning to Washington. Among them: (1) Rep. Green (D-Tex.) introduced bill (HR-95) to protect “individuals, families and Internet service providers” from spam. It was referred to both Commerce and Judiciary Committees. (2) Rep. Frelinghuysen (R- N.J.) offered bills to require Federal Trade Commission to set regulations protecting Internet privacy (HR-89) and to regulate Internet companies’ use of social security numbers and other personally identifiable information (HR-91). He also dropped measures prohibiting telemarketers from interfering with any caller ID service (HR-90) and to ensure efficient allocation of phone numbers (HR-92). All were referred to Commerce Committee, of which Frelinghuysen isn’t yet member.
Ind. Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) adopted first comprehensive update of service quality rules in 30 years. New rules are intended to take effect in May, pending legal review by state attorney gen. Among other changes, new rules covering incumbents and CLECs alike would require faster carrier responses to customer service complaints, toughen standards for outage restorations, require performance to be monitored at wire center level rather than by statewide averages. IURC said it began work on quality rule rewrite in late 1999, before last summer’s flood of service complaints against Ameritech.
FCC unanimously adopted notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that eyes frequencies, including those now occupied by military users, for 3rd-generation and other advanced wireless services. Commission also denied petition by Satellite Industry Assn. (SIA) seeking additional spectrum for mobile satellite services (MSS), move that Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS) licensees opposed (CD Aug 30 p1). FCC adopted notice Dec. 29, meeting White House’s year-end deadline for approving item, although text hadn’t been released by our deadline.
Time Warner Cable began offering commercial video-on-demand (VoD) service in Tampa Bay, expanding total reach of its nascent VoD service to 130,000 digital cable homes in Fla.’s Pinellas County. Concurrent Computer Corp., which is supplying technology for Time Warner, said deployment now exceeded total U.S. installed base claimed by other VoD suppliers. Time Warner also is using Concurrent’s video server and software system in Honolulu area.
Strategis Group report issued Thurs. cited “commercial uncertainties” that remain on 40-43.5 GHz band that European regulators were considering licensing for fixed wireless services. Study said band could allow new market entrants to gain foothold against dominant competitors. European Radiocommunications Committee has designated band for broadband, multimedia wireless systems, Strategis Group said. Among potential challenges for that spectrum is that adequate hardware may not be available for commercial operations, said Diane de Polignac, Strategis Group Europe consultant.
House Republicans surprised few with their choices for new committee heads late Thurs. Choices still had to be ratified by rank-and-file at our deadline. As expected, Telecom Subcommittee Chmn. Tauzin (R-La.) was promoted to Commerce Committee chmn., and Subcommittee Vice Chmn. Oxley (R-O.) was given expanded Banking Committee, apparently clearing way for Rep. Stearns (R-Fla.) to take over Subcommittee. Rep. Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) won Judiciary Committee, as expected, while Rep. Thomas (R-Cal.) gained Ways & Means.
Commerce Secy.-nominee Donald Evans was cautious on Internet and telecom issues in his appearance before Senate Commerce Committee Thurs., assuring panel members that he would give attention to their pet issues but making no specific commitments. Evans has been busy wandering halls of Senate since his nomination, having visited virtually all Committee members before hearing. He appeared to have little to no opposition, and several lawmakers said they expected to see him confirmed quickly following President Bush’s inauguration. Among topics raised by Senators: (1) NTIA’s Technology Opportunity Program (TOP), lauded by several members for providing technology funds to underserved regions. “I know how important the issue is,” said Evans of digital divide: “I will give it my attention.” He said he would try to convince business leaders to increase private efforts. (2) Wireless spectrum, which several senators said was major topic in their private meetings with Evans. Sen. Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) said country needed “spectrum management strategy… We go from crisis to crisis.” Evans acknowledged that he had just learned about 3rd-generation wireless technology “in the last 48 hours or so,” but said it might help solve digital divide. He agreed that govt. needed long-term strategy for managing and auctioning spectrum. (3) Bureau of Export Administration’s Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office, which Rockefeller said was “underfunded, understaffed.” (4) Internet taxation quandary, which Evans said was “going to be on all of our minds as we approach” Oct. end of current e-commerce taxation moratorium. However, he said, Bush Administration was “sensitive to what it might mean to the tax base of… the cities and the counties and the states. And so those factors need to be considered.” Evans said “important thing is to get all the right constituents to the table to talk” and “this is not something that we should wait until October or September or whenever to talk about it.” (5) Privacy. Asked by Sen. Wyden (D-Ore.) what his “general approach” would be on topic, Evans said only that he would work with ranking Democrat Hollings (S.C.) and Chmn. McCain (R-Ariz.) and others interested in issue. But he said “we shouldn’t continue to procrastinate.”