The FCC set June 6 as the deadline for comments, replies by July 8, in docket 24-119 about the state of competition in the communications marketplace for the agency’s biannual State of Competition in the Communications Marketplace report to Congress (see 2207050062). The agency sought data, information, and statistics for 2022 and 2023, as well as "any notable trends and developments that have occurred during early 2024," said a public notice Monday.

APCO representatives urged that the FCC seek additional comment on implementing next-generation 911. The FCC sought comment last year on proposals about quickening the adoption of NG911 (see 2309110042). “Proposed rules in this proceeding are focused on the delivery of 9-1-1 traffic, which comprises only the first part of the emergency communications chain,” APCO told Public Safety Bureau staff according to a filing Thursday in docket 21-479. “To take the next step toward achieving public safety’s vision for NG9-1-1, the Commission should initiate a further notice of proposed rulemaking to address interoperability requirements for 9-1-1 service providers and other elements of the emergency communications chain,” APCO said.

The FCC Enforcement Bureau sent a cease-and-desist letter to DigitalIPvoice Wednesday ordering the company to "stop serving as a gateway provider" for an apparently illegal robocall campaign regarding student loan debt. The bureau also notified U.S.-based voice service providers in a public notice that they may block traffic from DigitalIPvoice if the company fails to comply.

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel Monday urged the Office of Management and Budget to reclassify 911 communicators as first responders in the federal employment classification system. The letter marks National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week, which is this week. “Our Nation’s 911 operators are among our most vital first responders,” the letter argues: “The professionals who take these calls to set emergency response in motion operate with extraordinary skill in a pressure-filled environment.” Rosenworcel noted her long-standing advocacy of reclassifying the status of 911 communicators (see 1908140017) and that many states have taken that step.

All 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico now have NTIA approval for their digital equity plans following the agency's Thursday approvals of Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Mississippi, New Mexico and Utah’s plans (see 2403280064). All entities are now eligible to apply for the agency's initial round of digital equity capacity grant funding (see 2403290039).

Affordable connectivity program providers will be reimbursed up to $14 for providing the benefit to nontribal households next month, said an FCC Wireline Bureau public notice Tuesday in docket 21-450 (see 2403040077). ISPs will also be reimbursed up to $35 for serving tribal households and up to $47 for connected devices.

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel emphasized restoration of net neutrality rules to ensure public safety, during a Monday visit to the Santa Clara County, California, Fire Department. The fire department accused Verizon of throttling its service during the Mendocino Complex Fire (see 1808220059). "When firefighters are going into dangerous environments, they want to know that they have an internet that they can count on," Rosenworcel said. Although states like California have "stepped in and built their own net neutrality laws" since the commission's previous rules were repealed, it's "time that we have a national policy of internet openness," Rosenworcel said: "I think in the aftermath of the pandemic, making sure that there's a watchdog for the broadband connections we all count on, is the right thing to do."

The FCC’s net neutrality draft order got state support from California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) and the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA). Bonta's office said in a statement Friday that it supports “strong federal net neutrality rules that establish a floor of protection across the country.” The AG “especially applauds the draft order for acknowledging the important role states like California play in protecting net neutrality, and for declining to block enforcement of California’s own net neutrality law,” his office said. NASUCA praised the FCC draft for treating broadband as an essential service and leaving room for states. “The FCC correctly recognizes that there is a dual role for the federal government and states in addressing broadband and other essential services," and that classifying broadband internet access service "as Title II will enhance its ability to address public safety,” said Regina Costa, the group's telecom chair, in a Monday statement. NASUCA is glad the FCC declined to preempt California’s law or “all state authority over broadband,” she said. NARUC praised the draft last week (see 2404050068).

FCC commissioners approved a Further NPRM seeking comment on steps the agency can take to assist survivors of domestic violence access safe and affordable connected car services under the Safe Connections Act. Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel circulated the proposal in February (see 2402280053). Comments are due 30 days after Federal Register publication, 60 days for replies, in docket 22-238. "Having access to a car is also a lifeline," Rosenworcel said: "That is why in this rulemaking we propose that survivors should be able to separate lines that connect their cars."

The FCC's digital discrimination rules might inadvertently bar ISPs from offering discounted service to low-income subscribers, Phoenix Center co-founder/Chief Economist George Ford wrote Wednesday for the Yale Journal on Regulation. He said Congress in response needs to drop or rewrite the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Section 60506, which prohibits digital discrimination of broadband access "based on the protected classes limited to income level," including requiring services to be offered on “comparable terms and conditions." Section 60506 seeks to prevent any differentiation in price based on income, so a lower price offered only to lower-income households "could be legitimately argued to be prohibited discriminatory conduct under the FCC’s rules," he said. The affordable connectivity program plans offered today, the low-cost plans offered by ISPs prior to ACP, and the low-cost offerings required by the broadband equity, access and deployment program seem "to constitute a prima facia case of prohibited discrimination under the plain terms of the IIJA and the FCC's rules," he said.