Ketchikan, Alaska, was granted a waiver by the FCC Wireless Bureau to allow licensing of a Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave Station in the 6425-6525 MHz band, said a bureau order released in Tuesday’s Daily Digest (http://bit.ly/1iu8gVB). It said Ketchikan demonstrated it has no reasonable alternative to using frequencies in the 6425-6525 MHz band.

The FCC Wireless Bureau approved two waiver requests from Sprint allowing the carrier to deploy 800 MHz wideband operations in parts of Northern California and Nevada National Public Safety Planning Advisory Committee (NPSPAC) regions before the ongoing 800 MHz band reconfiguration is completed there. Granting the waivers “will permit LTE deployment in most of the counties within the Northern California and Nevada NPSPAC regions, providing Sprint’s subscribers access to these valuable broadband wireless services while protecting the remaining public safety entity from harmful interference,” the bureau said (http://bit.ly/1v2e3BV), saying taking the step is in the public interest. The 800 MHz rebanding is complete in both regions, except for two sites licensed to San Bernardino County in Northern California and one site licensed to the county in Nevada, the bureau said.

Representatives of Oceus Networks explained the progress the company has made providing U.S. military users with “tactical broadband wireless systems using commercial 4G LTE technologies,” in a series of meetings with FCC officials, according to ex parte filings posted Tuesday. The company met with both David Goldman, aide to Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, and Brendan Carr, aide to Commissioner Ajit Pai, said the filings in docket 13-185. “The team spotlighted the need for the U.S. military to train on these tactical systems domestically on remote training ranges and bases and the need for long-term spectrum access,” Oceus said (http://bit.ly/TrQ4zY).

The value of spectrum in the upcoming AWS-3 and TV incentive auctions is hard to predict and is based on more factors than growing demands for wireless data, said Citi analysts including Michael Rollins in a research report Sunday. The value of spectrum is also affected by the number of cell sites a carrier deploys and technology, Rollins wrote. “There is an economic trade-off between buying spectrum vs. building more sites,” he said. “In effect, the economic value of spectrum is tethered to the benefit of avoided cell site costs to serve the data traffic growth.” Rollins offered projected revenue for the auctions, predicting that a 10x10 MHz block will bring in $1.97 per MHz-POP; a 5x5 block, $1.20/MHz-POP; 10 MHz uplink spectrum, $0.87/MHz-POP; and 5 MHz uplink spectrum, $0.53/MHz-POP.

Carriers need certainty on when post-auction payments are due following the AWS-3 auction, CTIA said in reply comments to the commission. Uncertainty makes planning for the auction difficult for carriers likely to spend “millions, or even billions of dollars” for AWS-3 licenses, CTIA said Monday in a filing in docket 14-78 (http://bit.ly/1lLh1JV). “Uncertainty regarding payment deadlines could complicate and/or determine how capital is raised, how cash flow is managed, and how financials are reported,” CTIA said. “With such obstacles, full auction participation may be discouraged.” Specifically, the FCC should clarify that down payments and final payments are both due in 2015. The auction is to start Nov. 13. CTIA said auctions like the AWS-3 auction generally run one or two months.

LTE subscribers use “dramatically larger amounts of data than 3G subscribers,” Mobidia Technology said Monday in a report. LTE subscribers in Hong Kong averaged nearly 100 percent more data consumption than 3G subscribers during the first four months of 2014, the period covered by the report. LTE subscribers in Japan, South Korea and the U.S. had the top average data usage per subscriber, with subscribers in Japan using 3 GB per month during the study period, Mobidia said. LTE subscribers are also becoming increasingly reliant on Wi-Fi, with 75 to 90 percent of all mobile data usage from LTE phones occurring on Wi-Fi networks in major LTE markets (http://bit.ly/1izWbOr).

The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Monday asked for comment on a public trial of Comsearch’s TV white spaces database. The trial ended April 9. Comsearch told the FCC in a June report that during the 45-day trial, 63 different parties visited its site, with seven offering comments (http://bit.ly/1j8b85e). Comments to the FCC are due July 8, replies July 15, OET said in a public notice (http://bit.ly/1pbzvXL).

The FCC asked for comment on a Land Mobile Communications Council proposal that the agency extend conditional licensing authority to applicants for Part 90 site-based licenses in the 470-512 MHz and 800/900 MHz bands. But the Wireless and Public Safety bureaus refused to give LMCC a waiver it also sought pending the completion of a rulemaking (http://bit.ly/1nx8Ted). The LMCC asked for the change in a May 15 petition, arguing that it would provide greater flexibility for applicants “without compromising the quality of service available in T-Band or in the 800/900 MHz bands” (http://bit.ly/V64jw2). If approved, applicants could start using the spectrum while their applications are before the FCC, provided certain conditions are met, the LMCC said. The bureaus said Monday most applicants seeking a new station or to modify an existing public land mobile radio (PLMR) station below 470 MHz are permitted to operate the proposed station during the application’s pendency for a period of up to 180 days, stating 10 days after the application is submitted to the commission. This flexibility is not allowed for applicants in the PLMR bands above 470 MHz. LMCC said in its petition the distinction no longer makes sense. Comments are due July 23, replies Aug. 7.

The FCC fined Indigo Wireless $39,000 for failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing-aid compatible handsets in 2009. In December 2010, the FCC issued a notice of apparent liability for that amount against the carrier. In a response, Indigo questioned whether it was in violation and argued that the amount of the fine was “excessive, arbitrary, and would cause financial hardship to the company,” said an Enforcement Bureau order released Friday (http://bit.ly/1rqvI5W). The bureau said it found “no basis for cancellation or reduction of the proposed forfeiture.” The bureau disputed Indigo’s contention that any violation was not willful. “Willful noncompliance is not predicated on a finding of knowledge or intent to violate the law,” the bureau said. The fine is not out of line, said the bureau: “A carrier’s failure to offer the requisite number or percentage of digital hearing aid-compatible handset models can never be regarded as a minor violation, given the significance of the requirement.” Indigo had no comment.

The FCC proposed $34.9 million fine against Chinese company C.T.S. Technology is “impressive,” but may only be “symbolic,” said Fletcher Heald lawyer Mitchell Lazarus Friday in a blog post. The FCC said the fine would be the biggest in agency history (CD June 20 p5). If an offender won’t pay, the FCC’s usual recourse is to file a lawsuit in federal court, Lazarus wrote (http://bit.ly/SXEoED). The court’s reach may not extend to China, he said. “There is a treaty called the Hague Service Convention that may help, but we're guessing its implementation might be slow and uncertain.” Lazarus also questioned the extent to which C.T.S. actually violated the law. While C.T.S. did ship at least 10 devices to U.S. addresses, “it performed its acts in China, where it may be perfectly legal to ship jammers to U.S. addresses,” he said. While importation of the devices was “unquestionably unlawful,” wrote Lazarus, “FCC staffers, not C.T.S., did that by initiating the transactions and accepting delivery.” Citing the company for 275 devices it advertised but did not necessarily ship is still more “tenuous,” he said. “There is only one Internet; a company cannot easily promote its products on line in some parts of the world but not others.”