Expect the U.S. Supreme Court to support the White House and reject Missouri’s First Amendment challenge claiming administration officials colluded with Big Tech to censor COVID-19 content, legal experts said in interviews last week. Others in the case were less certain, saying the high court provided mixed signals during March 18 oral argument in Murthy v. Missouri (docket 23-411) (see 2403180051).
Though OnStar “ostensibly provides” Wi-Fi and location information for emergency services in case of an accident, customers were not aware the subscription in-vehicle security and communications service was “tracking data points about their driving” and sending it to their auto insurance companies to justify a rate increase, said a privacy class action (docket 2:24-cv-10804) Friday in U.S. District Court for Eastern Michigan in Detroit.
Every iPhone sale “guarantees revenue streams well beyond the initial purchase price,” said a class action Thursday (docket 24-cv-434085) in Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging violations of California’s Business and Professions Code. Plaintiff Kyle Whiteside of San Diego bought a new iPhone 13 in July 2021 from an Apple Store in Escondido, California.
The district court erred as a matter of law when it decided that right of way as used in the Wisconsin statutes encompassed any property subject to an easement for public use, such that Verizon could, without Deer District’s consent, lawfully install small cells and utility poles in the pedestrian mall that Milwaukee leased to the Wisconsin Center District and was subleased to Deer District, said Deer District’s opening brief in its 7th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court appeal.
The Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) and India-based Times Internet Ltd. share subscribers’ personally identifiable information (PII) to unrelated third parties alongside video content subscribers requested or obtained from their websites, allege two Video Privacy Protection Act class actions filed Thursday.
Apple’s anticompetitive conduct forced Louis Levine and class members to suffer “overcharge damages,” alleged his class action Wednesday (docket 2:24-cv-04284) in U.S. District Court for New Jersey in Newark. The class period covers iPhone individuals or entities that bought iPhones directly from Apple, other than for resale, from March 2020 to the present.
Despite assuring a customer that she wouldn’t be charged for service or hardware after a FiOS installation wasn’t successful, Verizon billed her and then reported her account as delinquent to credit reporting agencies (CRAs) Experian, TransUnion and Equifax, alleged plaintiff Ayesha Gordon in a Fair Credit Reporting Act complaint (docket 1:24-cv-00486) Wednesday in U.S. District Court for Eastern Virginia in Alexandria.
William Freemon is a “mass” content pirate who operates “an extensive and commercially scaled network” of illegal streaming services that offers unauthorized access to live channels and VOD streams of copyrighted movies and TV shows, alleged eight studios in an infringement complaint Wednesday (docket 3:24-cv-00733) in U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Durkin for Northern Illinois in Chicago granted T-Mobile’s motion to certify for interlocutory appeal to the 7th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court his Nov. 2 denial of the carrier’s motion to dismiss the claims of seven AT&T and Verizon customers seeking to vacate T-Mobile’s 2020 Sprint buy on antitrust grounds (see 2311290042), said the judge’s signed memorandum opinion and order Wednesday (docket 1:22-cv-03189).
General Motors, OnStar and LexisNexis Risk Solutions secretly collect consumers’ driver behavior data through vehicle computer systems and sell that data without consumers' full notice, knowledge or consent, alleged a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) class action Wednesday (docket 3:24-cv-00524) in U.S. District Court for Middle Pennsylvania in Scranton.