TiVo and TCL expanded and extended a licensing agreement for TiVo’s media patents, they said Thursday. The multiyear deal applies to TCL's TVs and AV devices. It lets TCL continue to deliver a good viewing experience "even as the television industry undergoes rapid transformation and change," said Samir Armaly, president-IP licensing at TiVo parent Xperi.
The import ban Ericsson seeks at the International Trade Commission against Samsung smart devices for allegedly infringing four wireless connectivity patents (see 2101080043) would “harm health and welfare, competitive conditions, and ultimately consumers in the United States,” Samsung commented (login required), as posted Tuesday in docket 337-3520. Though Ericsson “glibly assures” the ITC that its licensees “would be able to supply smartphones, tablets and smart TVs to backfill the vacuum its requested remedial orders would create, its failure to identify its alleged licensees, other than Apple (which does not produce devices for the Android ecosystem), makes it difficult to assess such a claim,” said Samsung. Ericsson “has failed to provide any factual support for its assertions,” it said. “Samsung cannot assess the manufacturing capacity of Ericsson’s unidentified alleged licensees, nor can Samsung determine whether these licensees offer competing products across the broad range of consumer electronic devices implicated by this investigation.” Samsung is the U.S. market leader in Android smartphones, tablets and smart TVs, it said. Apple devices “are not suitable replacements,” it said. Suppliers of Android and other operating systems “that currently enjoy minimal U.S. market share cannot replace the market leader in a commercially reasonable time,” it said. Ericsson didn’t comment Wednesday.
Samsung’s eNB LTE network equipment and 5G “access unit” infringe six Ericsson wireless communications patents dating to 2012, alleged a complaint (in Pacer) Friday in U.S. District Court in Marshall, Texas. It's Ericsson’s third patent infringement action against Samsung this month. Comments were due Tuesday at the International Trade Commission on public interest ramifications of the Tariff Act Section 337 import ban Ericsson seeks in a Jan. 4 complaint against Samsung smartphones, tablets and smart TVs for allegedly infringing four of its wireless connectivity patents (see 2101080043). Ericsson made similar accusations against Samsung Jan. 1 in the same Marshall court as Friday’s action (see 2101030001). Through its manufacture and sales of the eNB network equipment and 5G millimeter-wave access unit, “Samsung performed the acts that constitute induced infringement with knowledge or willful blindness that the induced acts would constitute infringement,” said the latest complaint. It seeks punitive and compensatory damages, plus a court declaration that Samsung’s infringement is willing. Samsung didn’t comment Tuesday.
China is “firmly opposed” to the Trump administration’s decision Thursday to add smartphone maker Xiaomi to a list of “Communist Chinese military companies” for new export restrictions, said a Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Friday. “What the U.S. side has done goes against the trend of history” and “violates the principles of market competition and international economic and trade rules,” he said. “China will take necessary measures to resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies and support them in defending their own rights and interests in accordance with law.”
The Copyright Office will post an updated version of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices-Third Edition on its website Jan. 28, Register of Copyrights Shira Perlmutter announced Thursday (see 1905100051). The compendium includes an “administrative manual for registrations and recordations issued by the U.S. Copyright Office on or after that date.”
A judge dismissed the Center for Democracy & Technology lawsuit against President Donald Trump that alleged his social media-related executive order violated the First Amendment (see 2006020071). U.S. District Court in Washington Judge Trevor McFadden dismissed the case with prejudice in a brief Tuesday order (Pacer). The court issued a Dec. 11 order granting the defendant’s motion for dismissal and a memorandum opinion (in Pacer), finding CDT’s “claimed injury is not concrete or imminent and is thus insufficient to establish Article III standing.” CDT had 30 days to file a motion for leave to amend its complaint. “To date, no motion for leave to amend has been filed on the docket,” McFadden wrote. CDT is considering its options, a spokesperson emailed Wednesday: "It is important that organizations be able to challenge unconstitutional executive orders."
IBM landed 9,130 U.S. patents in 2020, the most of any enterprise for the 28th-straight year, said the company Tuesday. The inventions spanned “key technology fields,” including artificial intelligence, hybrid cloud, quantum computing and cybersecurity, it said. The patents were granted to inventors in 46 states and 54 countries, it said.
The Patent and Trademark Office reopened the comment period that expired Dec. 28 to provide more time for input on applying “the traditional doctrines of trademark infringement to the e-commerce setting,” said Monday’s Federal Register. Comments are now due Jan. 25 in docket PTO-T-2020-0035 on “the effectiveness of the traditional doctrines of secondary trademark infringement” in e-commerce. PTO seeks recommendations “for resolving any shortcomings in the application of these doctrines.”
Comments are due Jan. 19 in docket 337-3520 at the International Trade Commission on public interest ramifications of the Tariff Act Section 337 import ban Ericsson seeks in a Jan. 4 complaint (login required) against Samsung smartphones, tablets and smart TVs, said Friday’s Federal Register. Ericsson alleges the Samsung devices with wireless connectivity infringe four of its patents. Ericsson asserted similar against Samsung in a New Year’s Day complaint in U.S. District Court in Marshall, Texas (see 2101030001). Samsung didn’t comment.
Video doorbells and IP cameras from Vivint Smart Home don’t infringe seven patents from SkyBell, SB IP Holdings and Eyetalk365 because the patents are “invalid,” commented the supplier Tuesday (login required) in International Trade Commission docket 337-3517. Arlo Technologies and SimpliSafe similarly argued a day earlier that all the allegedly infringed patents were continuations of an October 2002 application that was abandoned for nonpayment of fees and was never resurrected (see report, Jan. 7). Document snafus prevented Vivint from filing its comments until minutes after Tuesday’s deadline, it told the ITC (login required).