Free Access Broadcast & Telemedia wants the incentive auction's March 29 start pushed back to accommodate its court challenge of the way low-power TV licensees are treated in the auction rules, it said in a news release Friday. “Should the FCC decline to move back the kick-off date, FAB counsel may likely be forced to seek Court relief to delay the auction until all issues are resolved.”
Monty Tayloe
Monty Tayloe, Associate Editor, covers broadcasting and the Federal Communications Commission for Communications Daily. He joined Warren Communications News in 2013, after spending 10 years covering crime and local politics for Virginia regional newspapers and a turn in television as a communications assistant for the PBS NewsHour. He’s a Virginia native who graduated Fork Union Military Academy and the College of William and Mary. You can follow Tayloe on Twitter: @MontyTayloe .
The Form 177 application window for TV licensees to apply to participate in the incentive auction opened Tuesday at noon EST, two hours into the Incentive Auction Task Force’s workshop on filling out and submitting Form 177. “Once you leave here today, you’re on the clock,” IATF Chair Gary Epstein told the crowd of attorneys and broadcasters. “Please file early; we can’t stress this enough,” he said. The window to file Form 177 ends at 6 p.m. EST, Jan. 12, and Epstein said he expects to pull an all-nighter that evening. Broadcasters can still decide not to participate in the auction if they change their mind after the window closes, but those that don’t file Form 177 before Jan. 12 won’t be able to sell their spectrum, said Wireless Bureau Attorney Advisor Erin Griffith.
A T-Mobile reconsideration petition asking the FCC to restrict Dish Network’s bidding in the broadcast incentive auction because of Dish’s use of the designated entity rules in the AWS-3 auction isn't considered likely to get much traction, with agency leadership focused on maximum auction participation, lawyers and analysts told us Monday. The credibility of the incentive auction should also be important to the commission, T-Mobile Senior Vice President-Government Affairs Kathleen Ham said. “The auction needs to be fair. What happened in the last auction wasn’t fair.” Dish and the FCC didn't comment.
A recent spate of broadcast mergers is “putting pressure” on the FCC’s proposal to eliminate the UHF discount, Media Bureau Chief Bill Lake said on Friday at the Practising Law Institute’s Institute on Telecommunications Policy & Regulation. The deals, which include Gray’s purchase of Schurz’s stations and the proposed Media General/Meredith and Nexstar/Media General combinations, are seen as part of a scale “arms race” between broadcasters and multichannel video programming distributors, Lake said.
A draft order at the FCC on the incentive auction’s impact on low-power TV and translators would contain rules allowing LPTV stations to channel share with translators, delaying the deadline for LPTV to transition to digital, and allowing displaced LPTV stations to take advantage of FCC auction software to find new channels, agency officials told us. The item would also eliminate the analog tuner requirement for TVs and set up a new digital-to-digital translator service, an FCC official told us.
The definition of a cable system isn’t technology-neutral, said Rosemary Collyer, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, in an opinion saying streaming TV service FilmOn X isn't eligible for a compulsory license.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit consolidated challenges against the incentive auction from low-power TV industry companies into a single case, said an order released Monday. The order, a response to an unopposed motion from the FCC, combines challenges from Beach TV properties, Free Access & Broadcast (FAB) Telemedia, Mako Communications and Word of God Ministries into a single case with a mostly combined briefing schedule. LPTV industry officials not connected to the case told us they see the matter as one of the only chances to change the incentive auction’s effects on LPTV, though other broadcast officials said the auction may be too far along. LPTV stations aren’t part of the auction because the auction legislation doesn’t allow them to be, and LPTV should seek a solution from Congress, said former Expanding Opportunities for Broadcasters Coalition Executive Director Preston Padden. The FCC didn't comment Tuesday.
An upcoming FCC draft order on the incentive auction's impact on low-power TV and translators isn't seen as doing enough, said LPTV attorneys in interviews and LPTV investor Free Access Broadcast (FAB) and Telemedia in an ex parte filing. Chairman Tom Wheeler said the draft rules will “help enable LPTV and TV translator stations remain on the air,” in a recent letter to Congress (see 1511170066). The Advanced Television Broadcasting Alliance (ATBA) put up a website asking the public to sign a petition telling the FCC not to reserve any broadcast spectrum for wireless use. “Do you know that the FCC wants to take your TV Channels away?” said the headline above the petition.
The FCC will pay out reverse auction proceeds in a way that will allow channel sharing stations to get a favorable tax status from the IRS, the Wireless Bureau said in a public notice clarifying the commission's position Wednesday. The commission will follow the winning bidders' instructions in paying out the money, which allows the funds to be sent to qualified intermediaries or trusts instead of the bidders themselves. That's one of the requirements for channel sharing stations to claim that the auction money paid to channel sharing hosts represents a “like-kind exchange” and thus is eligible for deferred taxes.“The flexibility to instruct that payments be disbursed to a third party will facilitate channel sharing and thereby promote voluntary broadcaster participation in the reverse auction,” said the PN. The FCC said it received many inquiries about the policy (see 1511130041).
A U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit case involving several challenges to the FCC's 2014 quadrennial review rulemaking and the rule increasing attribution of joint sales agreements (JSAs) was moved to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, just a little over a week before oral argument in the case was to be heard in D.C. The venue change was requested months ago by Prometheus Radio Project and a coalition of public interest groups (see 1510140063), and is seen as being favorable to their case, several broadcast attorneys told us. The FCC, Prometheus' opponent in the case, also supported the move (see 1506190060), while NAB, which is challenging different aspects of the quadrennial review order, wanted the case to stay in D.C.