Matt Daneman

Wireless industry watcher responses were mixed after Comcast unveiled further details Thursday about its Xfinity Mobile wireless service. This "could be [Comcast's] next growth driver," Wells Fargo analyst Marci Ryvicker wrote investors. The offering "highlights cable's optionality and introduces another potential negative to the wireless industry," Macquarie's Amy Yong said.

Various parts of Ligado's LTE plans face spectrum-related opposition, which raises the risk of financial challenges for the company, said satellite consultant Tim Farrar in a blog post Wednesday. Farrar said there are indications the Federal Aviation Administration will heavily limit power levels in the 1527-1537 MHz downlink band, and the Department of Transportation may put even tighter limits; and there are efforts by the earth science community to prohibit an auction of the 1675-1680 MHz spectrum used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Iridium is trying to block use of the 1627.5-1637.5 MHz uplink band, and the 1647-1657 MHz uplink band likely can be paired only with 1527-1537 MHz low-powered downlinks. He also cited a column Tuesday in The Hill by Robert McDowell of Cooley in which the former FCC commissioner said Ligado's LTE plan, like the one proposed in 2010 by its predecessor LightSquared, "still causes harmful interference to already-licensed neighbors such as satellite services providers, NOAA’s weather service and the aviation industry" and should be rejected by the FCC. Farrar said Ligado has the finances to last into next year and continue lobbying, but the FCC may come to a decision this month given Chairman Ajit Pai's indication the agency plans to answer petitions within one year and Ligado's application and petition were put on public notice April 22, 2016. The agency didn't comment. Ligado in a statement Wednesday said McDowell -- whose firm represents Iridium -- made an "outdated and inaccurate characterization" of its satellite/terrestrial network and noted that McDowell, when testifying in 2014 as an expert witness in LightSquared's Chapter 11 bankruptcy, indicated GPS coexistence with Ligado's LTE network was technically feasible. McDowell told us Wednesday his 2014 testimony was about FCC process and timing issues, not about out-of-band emissions concerns in the 1627.5-1637.5 MHz band, and that Ligado's LTE plans still haven't resolved those. Ligado outside counsel Gerard Waldron of Covington & Burling said DOD indicated at a DOT workshop last month on adjacent band compatibility that it was comfortable with Ligado's LTE plans. A final DOT report is due later this month, Waldron said.

Liberty Interactive's proposed $1.12 billion buy of Alaska-based General Communication Inc. likely faces few regulatory approval challenges, because of assets of the parties and the current regulatory climate, experts told us. Cable consultant Steve Effros said there likely won't be any major issue for the deal under this administration.

An FCC revamp of broadband network overbuild terms it had put on Charter Communications' buys of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks likely points to the agency under Chairman Ajit Pai being far less likely to try to impose nontransaction-specific conditions in other cable ISP takeovers, experts told us. Overbuild conditions themselves might be somewhat unlikely, at least in cases when the fact pattern matches Charter/TWC, consultant and economist Hal Singer said.

With space primed to get more crowded with non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) satellite traffic, satellite operators and regulators increasingly will contend with collision and spectrum interference issues, experts said in interviews. A chief problem is that conjunction warnings to operators about possible collisions will go up exponentially due to that traffic, making it tougher to determine which possible collisions are the most likely and need addressing, said Secure World Foundation Program Planning Director Brian Weeden.

The 2005 Junk Fax Prevention Act doesn't authorize the FCC to require businesses have an opt-out notice on fax advertisements that were solicited by the receivers, so the 2006 solicited fax rule order is in violation of that, a U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit panel ruled Friday, with one judge dissenting. In the opinion, written by Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the court said the act requires an opt-out notice on unsolicited fax ads, but it doesn't do the same for solicited ones, with Congress clearly demarcating between the two. It said the FCC defense "has it backwards" in suggesting an agency can take an action as long as it's not prohibited by Congress: "Congress has not authorized the FCC to require opt-out notices on solicited fax advertisements. And that is all we need to know to resolve this case." The D.C. Circuit ruled the order vacated and remanded to the agency and dismissed petitions challenging FCC waivers given to fax ads sent before April 30, 2015, as moot. Raymond Randolph also joining in the majority decision. Numerous businesses challenged the rule (see 1408040030). In a dissent, Judge Cornelia Pillard said the FCC was reasonable in deciding opt-out notices are needed on all fax ads and that the court's opinion will put extra burdens on recipients trying to control their fax traffic, "precisely the sort of anti-consumer harm Congress intended to prevent." In a statement, Chairman Ajit Pai said the ruling "highlights the importance of the FCC adhering to the rule of law." He said he dissented from the 2014 order reaffirming the notice requirement (see 1410300047) "because, as I stated at the time, the agency’s approach to interpreting the law reflected ‘convoluted gymnastics.’ The court has now agreed that the FCC acted unlawfully. Going forward, the Commission will strive to follow the law and exercise only the authority that has been granted to us by Congress.” With the ruling, the D.C. Circuit "has shown that it is willing to take a hard look at the FCC’s [Telephone Consumer Protection Act] decisions, especially when they are difficult to square with the statute’s text or the practical realities that businesses face," said telecom lawyer Mark Brennan of Hogan Lovells, adding that there now will be increased attention on ACA v. FCC, "another TCPA case pending before the D.C. Circuit that involves the FCC’s interpretation of the term ‘automatic telephone dialing system’ and framework for calls to reassigned wireless numbers.” Friday's decision "reconfirms the proper and appropriate reading of the law," Commissioner Mike O'Rielly said in a statement. "It also signals that the court is willing to call the Commission to task for inappropriately creating authority not provided by Congress. I can only hope this view will be applied elsewhere, such as in the court's other case involving TCPA overreach.”

Creation of gigabit opportunity zones got tentative bipartisan support from some lawmakers, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said at American Cable Association event Thursday, adding he hopes to see such zones incorporated into any national infrastructure spending plan or as a stand-alone. He has pushed the idea for these zones -- featuring tax breaks to encourage private-sector gigabit broadband deployment -- for months (see 1609130061). Pai said that with infrastructure investment being a top national priority, the agency is particularly focused on looking at rules to see what can be eliminated or revised so as to encourage infrastructure-related investments. He said the agency is reviewing options for how to revisit Communications Act Title II classification of broadband. "We want every consumer … to have that open internet experience," Pai said. "But networks need incentive to invest and innovate." He said he had no idea of the status of the draft order on circulation removing the network overbuild condition on Charter Communications (see 1702240029). Pai said he hasn't talked with other commissioners about it, though he supports the revamping because the overbuild requirement "accentuates the digital divide." The cable industry crowd repeatedly applauded Pai, a marked contrast from the frost between the industry and previous Chairman Tom Wheeler (see 1605200037). "We don't view you as an enemy," Pai said, because Washington “recognizes this is the challenge of our time -- building a digital infrastructure across this country" -- and cable ISPs need incentives to make those investments. The FCC now has more focus on cable industry economic freedom, Macquarie analyst Amy Yong wrote investors Thursday. Commissioner Mike O'Rielly, speaking before the ACA this week, was clear that some previous FCC rulings could be reopened and amended, such as the Title II ban on paid prioritization by ISPs (see 1703290026), Macquarie said. With net neutrality rules likely to be rolled back, providers will have more options for favoring or prioritizing content, but removing such barriers benefits consumers by letting providers enhance their services, Macquarie said. Asked about future video regulation issues, Pai said the current independent programming NPRM has keyed up some of these issues and will "hopefully ... give us a better sense of what's going on in the marketplace." He said the commission is "trying to figure out the appropriate role for the FCC ... in this space."

The FCC should adopt an “eliminate-two-regulations-for-each-one-adopted” model as President Donald Trump is requiring for executive agencies, Commissioner Mike O’Rielly said Wednesday at an American Cable Association event. The agency has other routes for reviewing rules, but O'Rielly said it has "plenty of rules we can strike without undermining ... consumer protection."

The Trump administration's choice to head DOJ antitrust enforcement likely will be a textbook Republican enforcer, focused on the agency taking a light regulatory touch, antitrust experts and people who know nominee Makan Delrahim told us. Delrahim -- whose nomination the White House announced Monday evening -- “is not a radical," and is more in line with the types of antitrust appointees seen under the George W. and George H.W. Bush administrations, said Allan Van Fleet, an antitrust lawyer at McDermott Will, Tuesday. "I think he’ll be a traditional [antitrust head], slightly to the right of center." Delrahim, deputy counsel to the president, didn't comment.

Citing broad support for letting U.S. devices receive Galileo signals (see 1702220042), T-Mobile, Deere and Trimble are pushing for FCC approval. Meanwhile, the European Commission said it's working with Inmarsat to address the company's interference concerns. Thursday was the deadline for replies in docket 17-16 on the EC request. Instead of giving the EC a waiver, the FCC should decide the rules that require licensing of earth stations receiving signals from foreign satellites don't apply to mobile wireless user devices, T-Mobile wrote. Those rules, when adopted, were aimed at licensing of fixed services, and mobile wireless devices aren't what the FCC was contemplating then, it said, saying any protection of Galileo signals should mirror the protections given GPS. Deere and Trimble said the FCC should reject concerns about adjacent-band interference, since Galileo has transmitted in the 1559-1591 MHz band since 2006 without any reports of interference to systems operating below 1559 MHz. They said the waiver would boost positioning, timing and navigation service accuracy and dependability since Galileo could back up GPS. Inmarsat will do measurements to better assess how the Galileo system might affect its service, with the company and EC having agreed that if there's demonstrable harm to Inmarsat service the two parties will coordinate bilaterally to minimize the effects, the EC and Inmarsat wrote.